Just Get It

Originally posted on :

I don’t usually cite Athol Kay on Rational Male, but I have to give him props for his recent How Walkaway Wives Run a Dirty MAP. There’s a lot going on in this post, and as per usual Athol approaches all of his observations from a married perspective constrained by a limited single-life experience, but a few fundamental points of Game really shine here. To be sure, relationship Game (or married Game) varies widely in application compared to the Game used in single-man-sex-life, but the foundational principles are essentially the same – as are the pitfalls – only the risks are higher and the rewards negligible by comparison.

I’ve stated this before, but, having experienced the ups and downs of single-man-sex-life as well as married-man-sex-life, I can honestly say that I’ve never found Game more necessary than when it’s within the context of marriage. I’ve also written volumes about…

View original 1,225 more words

Alpha

Originally posted on :

The Alpha Buddah, Corey Worthington.

What I’m about to type here is not going to make me any new friends. I know because any discussion of what constitutes Alpha characteristics in a Man always becomes clouded by the self-perceptions of how well we think we align with them. As I’ve covered in prior postings, the ‘community’, the ‘manosphere’, the new understanding of gender relations that’s picked up momentum for the last 12 years has always generated it’s own terminologies for more abstract concepts. The danger in this is that these terms lack real, universal definition. For purposes of illustrating a concept these terms are usually serviceable – we have a general understanding of what makes for a ‘Beta’ or a Herb, or a man who falls into a ‘provider’ mentality. Even ‘Alpha’ in a specific context is useful as an illustrative tool, when the subject isn’t directly about ‘Alpha-ness’. It’s…

View original 971 more words

“If you like to gamble, I tell you I’m your man…”

Originally posted on 80-Proof Oinomancy:

Mae West:  Is poker a game of chance?

W.C. Fields:  Not the way I play it.

— From the film,  My Little Chickadee

I’ll play poker against Rollo Tomassi any day.

Earl, not so much.

I’ll explain why that is, now.

Sunshine Mary has a phenomenal post and dialogue here:

https://sunshinemaryandthedragon.wordpress.com/2013/07/01/why-are-we-pedestalizing-red-pill-women/

Read it?

Good.

Here are the comments that leapt out at me:

https://sunshinemaryandthedragon.wordpress.com/2013/07/01/why-are-we-pedestalizing-red-pill-women/#comment-13414

https://sunshinemaryandthedragon.wordpress.com/2013/07/01/why-are-we-pedestalizing-red-pill-women/#comment-13395

https://sunshinemaryandthedragon.wordpress.com/2013/07/01/why-are-we-pedestalizing-red-pill-women/#comment-13417

https://sunshinemaryandthedragon.wordpress.com/2013/07/01/why-are-we-pedestalizing-red-pill-women/#comment-13421

I’m usually very deep and cryptic.

So I’ll try to make it a little easier this time ’round.

See, what’s happening here is this:

Rollo is at the poker table playing cards.

He’s smart, insightful, knowledgeable and knows the rules cold.

But the problem is he’s still playing cards.

Earl is playing the other players.

Learning their alien thought-patterns.

Their risk assessment technique.

And, most of all, their “tells”.

That’s how to win at poker.

Rollo fails to grasp Earl’s meaning as Rollo…

View original 333 more words